This
document has been prepared to help you understand the Investigation and
Remediation process.
General Overview
HEA has experience with scores of soil and groundwater
investigations and remediations. Our group is comprised of hydrogeologists,
geologists, environmental scientists, engineers and project managers whose goals
are to reduce data from assessment projects and when necessary, design,
construct, operate and maintain remediation systems until closure of the
project.
The first position in reviewing a potential remediation
project is to develop the goals of the project: Is remediation necessary? Are
there “no action” alternatives which can meet a state or federal cleanup
guideline while serving all concerned parties and significantly controlling
capital expenditures? Project endpoints can sometimes be met without
implementing a costly remediation.
When remediation is necessary, it is the goal of the project manager to select the proper team from the group of remediation specialists.
Organizing a strong project team is crucial for the success of the project.
Together, the remediation team has the responsibility of supplying its customers
with “no further action” strategies, or full remedial design and
implementation services until project closure.
Remedial designs
Remedial designs which may be implemented by
the remediation team include:
·
Pure Oxygen Injection
Systems
·
Air Sparging and Soil
Ventilation Systems
·
Dual Phase Extraction
Systems
·
Bioremediation Processes:
in situ and ex situ
·
Groundwater Removal and
Treatment
·
Chemical Neutralization and
Stabilization
·
Dual Pump LNAPL Recovery
Systems
·
Off-gas Treatment,
Catalytic Oxidation
·
Soil Containment: Slurry
Walls, Caps
·
Construction Management:
Excavation and Disposal, Treatment
Cell Construction
The Remediation Process
The remediation process is actually part of a much larger
planning event that involves understanding the potential regulatory, technical,
and political forces that may affect a
project. The ultimate goal is to develop a written project strategy between the
customer and environmental consultant/contractor that defines the short and
long-term goals of the project.
STEP 1: Identifying the driving
forces behind the need for any action
Regulatory Driving Forces
·
soil/groundwater/air cleanup goals (local, state, federal)
·
site background conditions
·
environmental actions to date
·
sensitive receptors, long term exposure scenarios
·
health risk considerations
·
interim remedial actions
·
past acceptable remedial action measures
·
reimbursement potential
·
knowledge of the regulators
Technical Driving Forces
·
hydrogeologic/geologic environment
·
potential contaminants involved
·
transport mechanisms
·
health and safety
·
interaction of mixed wastes
Political Driving Force
s
·
third party impact by contaminants
·
legal obligations
·
budgetary and time constraints
·
media exposure/community relations
·
real estate strategy; sell/buy
·
ongoing operation of facility
·
future liabilities
STEP 2: Remedial Investigation-
Definition of the Release
The goal is to collect the maximum amount of information
with the smallest amount of expenditure. This is usually called the site
investigation or assessment. A site investigation will tell us:
·
Soil Type,
Hydrogeology
·
Contaminant Distribution
·
Contaminant Mass, Transport
Pathways
·
Conceptual suitability for
remediation techniques
·
Sensitive Receptors
STEP 3: Development of Remedial Goals
The idea is to develop a clean-up strategy based on correct information. This strategy incorporates
the real or perceived hazards related
to the release; the impacts to sensitive receptors that have or will occur; the
risk to human health and the environment; and finally determining the
closure process.
Closure is our
goal and is a negotiated set of targets worked out with the State/Federal
regulators that will lead to a “clean bill of health”. The closure process
may have stipulations that certain levels of chemicals can remain in soil
and groundwater based on little or no risks to human health and the environment.
STEP 4: Remedial Technology Selection
and Implementation
This is typically the creation of a corrective action
plan(CAP) that stipulates the technology being used,
why, how much it will cost, how long it will take. The CAP includes a full engineering design and implementation schedule.
STEP 5: Operation, Optimization, and
Closure Sampling of the Remedy
This step accounts for keeping the remedial system
operating, monitoring key parameters, adjusting the system to changing
conditions, and planning the closure. Many times the closure process will
include using natural-occurring mechanisms such as:
·
natural attenuation
·
natural biodegradation
processes
It is essential that the closure strategy is kept as the
ultimate goal of the project, and be continually re-evaluated under state or
federal regulations, as additional data becomes available.